Explain about NIMROD. Is he the antiChrist, the son of Satan?

Nimrod is an Old Testament personage from Genesis 10:8 “Now Cush (the son of Ham) became the father of Nimrod; he became a mighty one on the earth.”

He was the great grandson of Noah and would have had first-hand knowledge from his parents about the Lord. He had also been told how God saved Noah and his family from the flood and from the fallen angels who populated the earth before the flood.  As a close descendant of Noah, one can imagine that he was highly respected. He is credited in Genesis 10:10-12 with building many cities including the Tower of Babel in Babylon.

As the ruler of the city, Nimrod must have been influential in the building of this structure. A tall tower could have served as a high shelter to save people from another flood. Therefore, the tower was a rejection of God’s promise that there would be no more floods to destroy the earth.  It was also an example of great pride that people could escape God’s judgments by creating a tall refuge.

This displeased the Lord and in Genesis 11:5-8, the Lord mixes the languages and the people scattered to different places in the Earth: “The LORD came down to see the city and the tower which the sons of men had built. The LORD said, Behold, they are one people, and they all have the same language. And this is what they began to do, and now nothing which they purpose to do will be impossible for them.  Come, let us go down and there confuse their language, so that they will not understand one another's speech.  So the LORD scattered them abroad from there over the face of the whole earth; and they stopped building the city.  Therefore its name was called Babel, because there the LORD confused the language of the whole earth; and from there the LORD scattered them abroad over the face of the whole earth.”

In addition to this, there are many archeological artifacts which illustrate that Nimrod was involved with the introduction of many evil pagan worship practices and pagan doctrines. An interesting book along this line is The Two Babylons by Rev. Alexander Hislop. The author traces various Christian beliefs back to their evil inception in Babylon. However, evil as Nimrod was, he was a mere man – not the AntiChrist nor the son of Satan.

Who is antichrist in the Bible?

The word antichrist comes untranslated from the compound Greek word antichristos; “anti” meaning "in opposition to,” or, “in place of” and “Christ” meaning "anointed." Consequently, in order to understand what anti-Christ means —“a position in place of Christ”— we need to determine who the real “Anointed” is. Clearly, Jesus was “anointed” with the holy spirit at his baptism. (Matt. 3:16) Redeemed followers of Jesus, who also receive the anointing of the holy spirit, are considered part of Christ's body (I Cor. 12:12). Therefore, Christ is composed of the head, Jesus, and His body members, spirit-begotten followers of Jesus. However, these members are not now reigning (I Cor. 4:8) These body members are suffering now (Matt. 16:24).  Yet the scriptures promise that Christ will reign (with His church) over the nations for 1,000 years (Rev. 20:3). 

The antichrist has a parallel structure. It is a group of people with a leader and many members who follow that leader. Our Lord warned that many false Christs would come (Matt. 24:24) Of greatest importance is the fact that historically Christian believers have identified the Catholic Church as the Antichrist (see the forward to the King James Bible where antichrist is linked to the man of sin and Popish Persons). The Catholic Church, through the Pope, teaches that to receive forgiveness and salvation, a priest is necessary to sacrifice Christ at the altar in the Mass. They teach that every person must eat the body and blood of Jesus at the mass, do penance, and be forgiven of a priest. Pope Boniface VIII decreed, "We declare, say, define, pronounce it necessary to salvation for every human creature to be subject to the Roman pontiff." Ferraris' Ecclesiastical Dictionary, a standard Roman Catholic authority, under papal power, article 2 reads, " the pope is crowned with a triple crown, as king of heaven, of earth, and of hell…he occupies one and the same tribunal with Christ; so that whatsoever the pope does seems to proceed from the mouth of God…The pope is, as it were, God on earth…" Popes Innocent and Jacobatius state that "the pope can do nearly all that God can do,…" Today, some say that the Catholic Church has changed, but it is the constant claim of Papacy that its doctrines are unchangeable; that the decrees of its popes and councils are infallible.

Additionally, the Catholic Church teaches they reigned a 1,000 years as the Holy Roman Empire from 800 to 1800AD.  During this period, hundreds of thousands of non-Catholics were tortured, brutally murdered, and burned at the stake. This was certainly not Christ's kingdom!

Feeling the sting of Protestant criticism regarding “antichrist,” Francisco Ribera (1537–1591) a Spanish Jesuit theologian, from the University of Salamanca sought to remove the papacy and the Catholic Church from consideration as the Antichrist (as an act of countering the Protestant Reformation).  Ribera began writing a lengthy (500 page) commentary in 1585 on the Book of Revelation (Apocalypse) titled In Sacrum Beati Ioannis Apostoli, & Evangelistiae Apocalypsin Commentarij, proposing that the first few chapters of the Apocalypse apply to ancient pagan Rome, and the rest he limited to a yet future period of 3½ literal years, immediately prior to the second coming. Among many Christians today variations of Ribera’s thesis have been accepted.  We must strongly disagree with this rewrite of history.

What is 666 and what is the mark of the beast?

What is the beast itself? 

Looking to the lessons found in Daniel chapters 7 & 8 we discover that the beasts are picturing Gentile, earthly powers, governments or empires. At various times and places, these powers would exercise dominion over the Lord’s people acting in a beast-like manner. The “Lord’s people” would include the natural seed of Abraham, (the Jews) and the spiritual faith seed, (the Christian church). In due course, they would both come under attack and under the governmental power of these beast-like entities.

These “beasts” historically were a combining of civil and religious authorities. In its latter stages it was depicting the “Holy Roman Empire” which was a uniting of European monarchs with Papal clergy. This union was completely illicit, meaning that the true church of Jesus Christ, metaphorically “virgins”, were not supposed to unite with the kings of the earth… rather the true church was instructed to wait for their Lord Jesus to return. At His second coming, they would then be Jesus’ bride and receive kingdom power and glory from Him. Some church men full of ambition could not wait for their Lord to return and entered into these illicit relations with earthly rulers, kings. This is stated in Revelation 17 and 18.

Rev 17:1-2, “And one of the seven angels who had the seven bowls came and spoke with me, saying, "Come here, I shall show you the judgment of the great harlot who sits on many waters, with whom the kings of the earth committed {acts of} immorality, and those who dwell on the earth were made drunk with the wine of her immorality." (NAS)

Rev 18:3, “For all nations have drunk of the wine of the wrath of her fornication, and the kings of the earth have committed fornication with her, and the merchants of the earth are waxed rich through the abundance of her delicacies.” (KJV)

Even in the early church, there was a premature desire to reign before Jesus returned. The Apostle Paul writes in 1Cor.4:8, “…You have begun to reign – and that without us! How I wish that you really had begun to reign so that we also might reign with you!” No, when churches and believers try to reign before they are united with Christ in heaven, their union with earthly governments is considered illicit by God.

What then is the significance of the “mark” and the “666”?

When leaders are empire building unity is key to maintain power. As such, the Emperors of the Roman Empire needed to achieve unity of religious belief. But, as stated above this was an illegitimate arrangement to begin with. The doctrines produced during these times were also illegitimate. But in beast-like fashion the rulers forced conformity to these “orthodox” dogmas and any that rejected the teachings were branded as heretics. Any that wanted a place in this arrangement received the “mark,” which is to say that they gave their ascent to support this illegitimate arrangement and paid homage to it giving it some level of support.

The “number” is the “number of a man” which we understand to be speaking of the “man of sin.”  In 2 Thessalonians 2:3 this is synonymous with the office of the male figure of the pope, the papa. On the number “666”we can offer 2 suggestions.

– 6 is scripturally a number of earthly accounting and even of imperfection and evil, and therefore fits well with a beastly government.
– Latin “Vicarivs Filii Dei” on the pope’s tiara means “vicar of the son of God.” Letters have a numeric value in Roman numerals and lend themselves to the term “count,” or “calculate” in vs.18. This number, when calculated, totals up to 666. This is how it works – start with “Vicarivs Filii Dei”. Then take out all the Latin letters, which are V, I, C, L, and D. The numeric values for these letters are as follows: V = 5, I = 1, C = 100, L = 50, and D = 500. There are two V’s (10), six I’s (6), one C (100), one L (50), and one D (500). Thus, V,V,I,I,I,I,I,I, C,L,D equals 10+6+100+50+500. The sum is 666.